Chrétien said in his "sort of" resignation speech, that he was doing it for the good of the country, so that Parliament could once again concentrate on good governance. Bull!
Once the war was totally engaged, and all sides knew the consequences of defeat, especially the Allies: winning became the only consideration. And at all costs.
Like Sherman in 1864 and Truman in 1945, Sharon chose to put the lives of enemy civilians at risk in order to achieve his military objective. By Robert Sauvé - Ottawa
I saw a Washington Post Bureau Chief being interviewed on CNN (Crescent News Network), the evening of the fatal attack. And what she said was incredible. She described this event as an equal to the Passover Massacre.
I can think of no significant benefit any country has ever received from harboring God as part of their nationality. But to the contrary, I sure can think of the evil.