Editorials Archives

Like Sherman in 1864 and Truman in 1945, Sharon chose to put the lives of enemy civilians at risk in order to achieve his military objective. By Robert Sauvé - Ottawa

I saw a Washington Post Bureau Chief being interviewed on CNN (Crescent News Network), the evening of the fatal attack. And what she said was incredible. She described this event as an equal to the Passover Massacre.

If Israel blocks the right of ALL of its citizens to equal ownership of property, Israel will be abrogating EVERYTHING it is supposed to be.

Israelis will have to decide if Israel is a democracy or not. By Robert Sauvé.

The world stage however, isn't Canada, where politicians get away with this Québécois kind of stuff everyday.

Canada and the USA are two of the greatest countries in which to live. Therefore; the current system(s) can't be all that bad.

I can think of no significant benefit any country has ever received from harboring God as part of their nationality. But to the contrary, I sure can think of the evil.

In the article, the National Post inevitably boiled it down to language.

Amnesty international has done as much for human rights in their entire existence, as the USA does in any given day.

So, Bush accomplished his objectives: denounce state sponsors of terror, and isolate them from their people and the global community with a sound-byte that has resonated around the world, "axis of evil".